Lesson10: The Computer as a Tutor
The computer is one of the wonders of human ingenuity, even in its
original design in the 1950s to carry out complicated mathematical and logical
operations. With the invention of the microcomputer (now also commonly referred
to PCs or personal computers), the PC has become the tool for programmed
instruction.
Educators saw much use of the PC. It has become affordable to small business, industries and homes. They saw its potential for individualization in learning, especially as individualized learning is a problem since teachers usually with a class of forty or more learners. They therefore devised strategies to use the computer to break the barriers to individualized instruction.
Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI)
The computer can be a tutor in effect relieving the teacher of many activities in his personal role as a classroom tutor. It should be made clear, however, that the computer cannot totally replace the teacher since the teacher shall continue to play major roles of information deliverer and learning environment controller.
Even with the available computer and CAI software, the teacher must:
• Insure that the
students have the needed knowledge and skills for any computer activity.
• Decide the
appropriate learning objectives
• Plan the sequential
and structured activities to achieve objectives.
• Evaluate the
students’ achievement by ways of tests of the specific expected outcomes.
Today, educators accept the fact that the computer has indeed
succeeded in providing an individualized learning environment so difficult for
a teacher handling whole class. This is so, since the computer is able to allow
individual students to learn at their own pace, motivate learning through a
challenging virtual learning environment, and assist students through
information needed during the learning process.
REFLECTION
There has been a
fear that someday in the future teachers will be replaced with CAI because as
an assessment it is much better if we will used the computer to assist as in
our learning for it is consistent and objective. Yes, it is partly true and
also partly wrong because we all know that there are roles that teachers have
to do that CAI cannot. A computer cannot assess and insure if the students have
the needed knowledge and skills for it does not have any will and intellect, a
teacher can decide the appropriate learning objectives while computers do not,
a teachers can plan any structured activities to achieve objectives suited to
the needs of its students and a teacher can evaluate the student’s achievements
by ways of tests of the expected outcomes. With CAI, we can only expect lower
level learning skills and what is only programmed in the computer will be the
only thing a student will learn unlike with a teacher, we can learn more from
him/her as we can freely asks questions or can interact with different
experiences in life.
Maybe CAI can be
used on some areas of a student’s learning but it can’t represent in behalf of
the teacher in all aspects. Drill and practice software materials can be useful
if we want excellence in the use of the computer. But to make it a teacher, it
can’t never be. Teachers are still the best and suited way for a student to
learn more, computers can only assist.